Elsevier

Global Environmental Change

Volume 53, November 2018, Pages 265-272
Global Environmental Change

Sharing benefits or fueling conflicts? The elusive quest for organizational blue-prints in climate financed forestry projects in Ethiopia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.10.007Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Highlights

  • Strong reliance on organizational blueprints in climate financed forestry projects conceal the unequal distributions of natural resources.

  • The logic and rules embedded in the climate financed forestry projects lead to social exclusion, elite capture and state-sanctioned land grab.

  • Despite euphoria at international level climate financed interventions often negatively affect rural livelihoods.

  • Efforts to establish safeguards are at best managing in the margin and at worst legitimizing a structurally unequal process.

Abstract

Despite euphoria at international level there is a growing concern that participatory forest conservation projects established with climate finance might not lead to the assumed win-win solution expressed in policy rhetoric of addressing both forest degradation and persistent poverty. Based on two climate financed forestry (pilot) projects in Ethiopia, this paper shows that the strong reliance on organizational blueprints and the focus on crafting institutions concealed the more pertinent issues at stake, in particular the unequal distributions of natural resources as result of the enclosure of the commons. The logic and rules on which the projects have been designed have been superimposed on existing social relations of power and prevailing organizational configurations, leading to aggravation of conflicts over resources as result of social exclusion, elite capture and even state-sanctioned land grab. This does not only points to the elusiveness of the quest for the best organizational model to implement such forestry projects, but also questions the faith in climate finance mechanisms at international level and the effectiveness of the efforts made by advocacy groups to establish safeguards to minimize possible negative outcomes at local level.

Keywords

Climate financing
REDD+
Market environmentalism
Conflicts over natural resources
Livelihoods
Land grab

Cited by (0)