Elsevier

Algal Research

Volume 31, April 2018, Pages 347-362
Algal Research

Techno-economic evaluation of microalgae harvesting and dewatering systems

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2017.11.038Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Highlights

  • Quantitative analysis of algae harvesting-dewatering based on engineering data.

  • Closed cultivation has 3–5 fold lower costs and energy uptake than open cultivation.

  • Upscaling is essential to reduce costs and energy consumption to a feasible level.

  • Labour is a major contributor to the operational costs.

  • Harvesting and dewatering contribute 3–15% to algae biomass production costs.

Abstract

Microalgal biomass is processed into products by two main process steps: 1) harvesting and dewatering; and 2) extraction, fractionation and conversion. The performance of unit operations for harvesting and dewatering is often expressed in qualitative terms, like “high energy consumption” and “low in operational cost”. Moreover, equipment is analysed as stand-alone unit operations, which do not interact in a chain of operations. This work concerns a quantitative techno-economic analysis of different large-scale harvesting and dewatering systems with focus on processing cost, energy consumption and resource recovery. Harvesting and dewatering are considered both as a single operation and as combinations of sequential operations. The economic evaluation shows that operational costs and energy consumption are in the range 0.5–2 €·kg 1 algae and 0.2–5 kWh·kg 1 of algae, respectively, for dilute solutions from open cultivation systems. Harvesting and dewatering of the dilute systems with flocculation results in the lowest energy requirement. However, due to required chemicals and loss of flocculants, these systems end at the same cost level as mechanical harvesting systems. For closed cultivation systems the operational costs decrease to 0.1–0.6 €·kg 1 algae and the energy consumption to 0.1–0.7 kWh·kg 1 algae. For all harvesting and dewatering systems, labour has a significant contribution to the total costs. The total costs can be reduced by a high level of automation, despite the higher associated investment costs. The analysis shows that a single step operation can be satisfactory if the operation reaches high biomass concentrations. Two-step operations, like pressure filtration followed by spiral plate technology or centrifugation, are attractive from an economic point of view, just as the operation chain of flocculation followed by membrane filtration and a finishing step with spiral plate technology or centrifugation.

Keywords

Microalgae
Harvesting
Dewatering
Cost
Energy
System analysis

Cited by (0)