Elsevier

Environmental Science & Policy

Volume 66, December 2016, Pages 47-61
Environmental Science & Policy

QUICKScan as a quick and participatory methodology for problem identification and scoping in policy processes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.07.010Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Highlights

  • QUICKScan speeds up the exploratory phases of the policy cycle.

  • It creates a joint understanding through a participatory process.

  • Integrate quantitative and qualitative scientific-, local- and tacit knowledge.

  • 70 workshops in 20 countries: diversity of problems and spatial and temporal scale.

Abstract

Policy making is required in cases in which a public good needs to be either maintained or created, and private or civil initiatives cannot deal alone with this. Policy making thus starts with a phase of problem identification and determining whether there is a problem that needs to be dealt with. Rapidly evolving contexts exert influence on policy makers who have to take decisions much faster and more accurately than in the past, also facing greater complexity. There is a need for a method that lowers the lead time of the exploratory phase of the policy cycle. At the same time the method should create a joint understanding of the most important interactions. This paper proposes QUICKScan, a method, process and spatially explicit tool, to jointly scope policy problems in a participatory setting, investigate the most important interactions and feedbacks and assesses the state of knowledge and data of relevance to the problem. QUICKScan uses strongly moderated participatory workshops bringing together a wide range of stakeholders relevant to the policy issue. These moderated workshops jointly build an expert system in a spatially explicit tool using functionality of bayesian belief networks, python programming, simple map algebra and knowledge matrices, with a strong focus on visualization of results. QUICKScan has been applied in 70 different applications in a range of different policy contexts, stakeholders and physical locations. Through these applications participants were able to internalize the knowledge that was usually handed to them in briefs and reports, to develop a joint understanding of the main interactions and their link to impacts and to develop a problem statement and solution space in a reduced lead time. Ultimately, QUICKScan demonstrates another role of science, not solely as a knowledge production, but also facilitating the knowledge consumption.

Keywords

Participatory
Decision making
Trade-off
Environmental policy
Spatial planning
Impact assessment

Cited by (0)