Abstract
In Lake Zone, Tanzania, farmers were trained to multiply and distribute quality sweetpotato planting material. The objectives of this study were to assess changes in skills and practices among the trained farmers as vine multiplication became a specialized task. Nine months after the project ended, all 88 decentralized vine multipliers (DVMs) operating as groups (72%) or individuals (28%) were visited and qualitative data on their current multiplication practices collected through a questionnaire, checklists and observations. Results showed that 69% of DVMs were still multiplying vines, but less than half were using the seed production technologies promoted by the project. 34% used rapid multiplication beds; 61% used conventional plant spacing on ridges for roots and vines and 5% used both. As the vine multiplication cycle became a specialised activity, the multiplication and root production cycles were separated. Vines were treated differently in terms of site selection, length of cutting and spacing, depending on whether the objective of their use was for high root or high vine production. Capacity building of specialised vine multipliers and scaling-up seed interventions should consider the implications of skilling and task segregation in a broader context based on society’s choice of technologies and agrarian change.
References
David, S., Farmer seed enterprises: A sustainable approach to seed delivery? Agriculture and Human Values, 2004, 21(4): 387-39710.1007/s10460-004-1247-5Search in Google Scholar
Coomes, O. T., McGuire, S. J., Garine, E., Caillon, S., McKey, D., Demeulenaere, E., et al., Farmer seed networks make a limited contribution to agriculture? Four common misconceptions. Food Policy, 2015, 56: 41-5010.1016/j.foodpol.2015.07.008Search in Google Scholar
McGuire, S. and Sperling, L., Seed systems smallholder farmers use. Food Security, 2016, 8(1): 179-19510.1007/s12571-015-0528-8Search in Google Scholar
McEwan, M., Almekinders, C., Abidin, P. E., Andrade, M., Carey, T., Gibson, R., Naico, A., Namanda, S., Schulz, S., Can small still be beautiful? Moving local sweetpotato seed systems to scale in sub-Saharan Africa. In: Low, JW. et al. (eds.) Potato and Sweetpotato in Africa Transforming the Value Chains for Food and Nutrition Security. CABI, UK, 201510.1079/9781780644202.0289Search in Google Scholar
Kapinga, R. E., Ewell, P. T., Jeremiah, S.C., Kileo, R., Sweetpotato in Tanzanian Farming and Food Systems: implications for research. International Potato Center, Nairobi, Kenya. Ministry of Agriculture, Tanzania, 1995Search in Google Scholar
Namanda, S., Gibson, R.W., Sindi, K., Sweetpotato Seed Systems in Uganda, Tanzania, and Rwanda. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 2011, 35(8): 870-88410.1080/10440046.2011.590572Search in Google Scholar
Adam, R. I., Gender and the Dynamics of Production and Distribution of Sweetpotato Planting Materials Among Smallholder Farmers in the Lake Victoria Zone Region, Tanzania. PhD thesis, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, USA, 2014Search in Google Scholar
Jeremiah, S. C., Kulembeka, H. P., Kanju, E., Chirimi, B., Amour, R., The role of community based oganisations, NGOs and farmers in technology transfer. Proceedings of the XIIIth Triennial Symposium of the International Society for Tropical Root Crops, Arusha, Tanzania, 2007Search in Google Scholar
Kimenye, L., and McEwan, M., eds. Scaling up, Dissemination and Adoption of Agricultural Technologies using Innovation Platforms - Lessons from Eastern and Central Africa. ASARECA, Uganda, 2014Search in Google Scholar
Stone, G.D., Agricultural Deskilling and the Spread of Genetically Modified Cotton in Warangal. Current Anthropology, 2007, 48, (1), 67-10310.1086/508689Search in Google Scholar
Catholic Relief Services. SASHA Marando Bora Final Technical Report., Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, 2012Search in Google Scholar
Laizer, L. and Walsh S., Seed system lessons learned from Marando Bora in Lake Zone, Tanzania. Paper presented at 16th Triennial Symposium of the International Society for Tropical Root Crops, 23-28 September 2012, Abeokuta, Nigeria.Search in Google Scholar
Jansen, K., and Vellema, S., What is technography? NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 2011, 57(3-4): 169-17710.1016/j.njas.2010.11.003Search in Google Scholar
Yin, R. K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods. California, USA, Sage Publications Inc., 2009Search in Google Scholar
Silverman, D., Doing Qualitative Research a Practical Handbook. London, Sage Publications Ltd., 2010Search in Google Scholar
Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of Innovations, Free Press, New York, 2003Search in Google Scholar
Walker, T., Alene, A., Ndjeunga, J., Labarta, R., Yigezu, Y., Diagne, A., Andrade, R., Muthoni Andriatsitohaina, R., De Groote, H., Mausch, K., Yirga, C., Simtowe, F., Katungi, E., Jogo, W., Jaleta, M. & Pandey, S., Measuring the Effectiveness of Crop Improvement Research in Sub-Saharan Africa from the Perspectives of Varietal Output, Adoption, and Change: 20 Crops, 30 Countries, and 1150 Cultivars in Farmers’ Fields. Report of the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment (SPIA), CGIAR Independent Science and Partnership Council (ISPC) Secretariat: Rome, Italy, 2014 (Accessed 6/11/2016 http://impact.cgiar.org/files/pdf/ISPC_DIIVA_synthesis_report_FINAL.pdf)Search in Google Scholar
Glover, D., Sumberg, J., Andersson, J. A., The Adoption Problem; or Why We Still Understand so Little about Technological Change in African Agriculture. Outlook on Agriculture, 2016, 45(1): 3-6 10.5367/oa.2016.0235Search in Google Scholar
© 2017
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
