A dual-isotope-labeling method of studying the bioavailability of hexaglutamyl folic acid relative to that of monoglutamyl folic acid in humans by using multiple orally administered low doses23

https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/84.5.1128Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

ABSTRACT

Background: The bioavailability of dietary folate may be hampered by the need of the glutamate moieties to be deconjugated before absorption. Previous studies comparing the bioavailabilities of polyglutamyl and monoglutamyl folic acid had inconsistent results.

Objective: The objective was to estimate the bioavailability of polyglutamyl relative to that of monoglutamyl folic acid by using a sensitive stable-isotope approach that allowed for the administration of multiple low doses in humans.

Design: Twenty subjects aged 20–50 y ingested 2 capsules daily for 28 d; each capsule contained ≈50 nmol [13C6]hexaglutamyl and ≈50 nmol [13C11]monoglutamyl folic acid. Amounts of the isotopically labeled compounds in the capsules were verified by various methods. The degrees of isotopic enrichment of plasma 5-methyltetrahydrofolate with 13C6 and 13C11 were measured by using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, and the ratio of 13C6 to 13C11 (13C6:13C11) in plasma on day 28 was used as a measure of their relative bioavailability.

Results: The 13C11:13C6 in plasma 5-methyltetrahydrofolate reached equilibrium on day 4 and was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.58, 0.74) on day 28. The 13C11:13C6 content in the capsules varied between 1.18 and 1.96. After correction for this ratio, the estimated bioavailability of hexaglutamyl relative to that of monoglutamyl folic acid was ≥78%.

Conclusion: Multiple dosing of low amounts of labeled folic acid is a sensitive, accurate, and efficient method of measuring the relative bioavailability of folic acid compounds, provided that the administered doses can be reliably assessed.

Keywords:

Folic acid
bioavailability
stable isotopes
humans
mass spectrometry

Cited by (0)

2

Clive West died on 27 August 2004.

3

Supported by the Wageningen Centre for Food Sciences, an alliance of major Dutch food industries, Maastricht University, TNO Quality of Life, Wageningen University and Research Centre, the Dutch government, and grant no. R03 CA10331 from the National Cancer Institute.