Figures
Abstract
Background
Ethanol-induced gut barrier disruption is associated with several gastrointestinal and liver disorders.
Aim
Since human data on effects of moderate ethanol consumption on intestinal barrier integrity and involved mechanisms are limited, the objectives of this study were to investigate effects of a single moderate ethanol dose on small and large intestinal permeability and to explore the role of mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway as a primary signaling mechanism.
Methods
Intestinal permeability was assessed in 12 healthy volunteers after intraduodenal administration of either placebo or 20 g ethanol in a randomised cross-over trial. Localization of the tight junction (TJ) and gene expression, phosphorylation of the MAPK isoforms p38, ERK and JNK as indicative of activation were analyzed in duodenal biopsies. The role of MAPK was further examined in vitro using Caco-2 monolayers.
Results
Ethanol increased small and large intestinal permeability, paralleled by redistribution of ZO-1 and occludin, down-regulation of ZO-1 and up-regulation of myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) mRNA expression, and increased MAPK isoforms phosphorylation. In Caco-2 monolayers, ethanol increased permeability, induced redistribution of the junctional proteins and F-actin, and MAPK and MLCK activation, as indicated by phosphorylation of MAPK isoforms and myosin light chain (MLC), respectively, which could be reversed by pretreatment with either MAPK inhibitors or the anti-oxidant L-cysteine.
Citation: Elamin E, Masclee A, Troost F, Pieters H-J, Keszthelyi D, Aleksa K, et al. (2014) Ethanol Impairs Intestinal Barrier Function in Humans through Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase Signaling: A Combined In Vivo and In Vitro Approach. PLoS ONE 9(9): e107421. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107421
Editor: Salvatore Petta, Sezione di Gastroenterologia, Italy
Received: March 24, 2014; Accepted: August 8, 2014; Published: September 16, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Elamin et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This study is supported by the Top Institute Food and Nutrition. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors hereby declare that the funder Top Institute Food and Nutrition had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors hereby declare that the affiliation to Top Institute Food and Nutrition had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Introduction
Ethanol (ethyl alcohol) consumption is associated with several gastrointestinal (GI) and liver disorders, especially alcoholic liver disease (ALD) [1]. ALD is a progressive disease initiated by steatosis and inflammation, followed by liver fibrosis and cirrhosis [2]. Only 30% of chronic alcoholics eventually develop cirrhosis, indicating that additional factors are required [3]. Recent evidence points to a role for the gut-liver axis in the pathogenesis of ALD [4]. Ethanol is known to disrupt GI epithelial barrier integrity [5], resulting in translocation of potentially harmful bacteria and their products such as endotoxins [6] and peptidoglycans [7] into the portal circulation and consequently, liver injury. Dysfunction of GI mucosal barrier may result in increased susceptibility not only to infections [8] but also to development of ethanol-related GI cancers [9].
Human studies investigating effects of ethanol on intestinal barrier function have focused mainly on chronic heavy drinkers (>80 g/day) [10], demonstrating that ethanol increases small intestinal permeability [11]. Effects of moderate ethanol consumption on GI barrier function are less well known but are especially relevant since daily moderate alcohol consumption (daily intake of 1–2 alcoholic drinks or 12–24 g ethanol), is widespread [12]. Ethanol and its metabolites can reach the distal GI tract through the vascular space [13]. Therefore, ethanol and its metabolites may be injurious not only to the small but also to the large intestinal barrier. Intestinal barrier integrity is maintained by the tight junctions (TJs), a complex meshwork of transmembrane and cytoplasmic proteins including occludin, the claudins and the zona occludens family (ZO-1,2,3), linked to the cytoskeletal protein F-actin [14]. The TJs are supported by the adherens junctions proteins (AJs) E-cadherin and β-catenin, which are also required for TJ assembly [15]. Data obtained in vitro using intestinal epithelial cells (Caco-2 cell monolayers) indicate that ethanol disrupts TJs integrity via mechanisms involving oxidative stress [11], modulation of microtubules [16] and activation of the cell signaling pathway myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) [17]. The three isoforms of mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) isoforms including P38, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and stress-activated protein kinase/C-Jun N-terminal kinase (SAPK/JNK) have been shown to modulate TJs integrity [18]. Furthermore, activation of MAPK has been reported to mediate intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction [19]. Data on mechanims of ethanol-induced barrier dysfunction are mainly derived from in vitro studies [20]. In addition, insight into effects of moderate doses of ethanol on human intestinal barrier function and potential mechanisms involved is still lacking.
Our aims were to determine effects of a single moderate dose of ethanol, administered intraduodenally, on 1) small intestinal and colon permeability and 2) localization and expression of TJ in duodenal biopsies. In addition, the role of MAPK pathway as a primary signaling mechanism involved in ethanol-induced barrier disruption was investigated both in vivo in duodenal biopsies and in vitro in Caco-2 cell monolayers.
Subjects and Methods
Subjects and study design
The protocol for this trial and supporting CONSORT checklist are available as supporting information; see Checklist S1 and Protocol S1. The study was performed according to a randomized placebo-controlled crossover design, in 12 healthy subjects recruited between October 2010 and July 2011. Participants were healthy men from Caucasian ethnicity, between 18 and 45 years of age to avoid genome-related differences in ethanol metabolism [21]. Exclusion criteria included BMI>35 kg/m2, history of GI disorders, liver diseases i.e. hepatitis and cirrhosis, abdominal surgery, excessive alcohol consumption (>20 g/day) and smoking. The study flow diagram is shown in Figure S1. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC), conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and registered at the Clinical Trial Registry (www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT00928733). All participants provided written informed consent. An overview of the experimental procedures is given in Figure S1. The study consisted of two test days in a random order, with a washout period of one week. Participants arrived at the MUMC at 08:00 AM after an overnight fasting. An intravenous cannula was placed in an antecubital vein for blood sampling. Then, the tube was placed intraduodenally and optimal positioning was confirmed by X-ray.
Moderate ethanol intake is difficult to define. However, despite the complexity, Department of Agriculture and Department of Health and Human Services define moderate consumption of one standard drink a day for women and two drinks men [22]. A standard drink is generally considered to be 360 ml of beer, 150 ml of wine, or 45 ml of 80-proof distilled spirits. These drinks contain roughly the same amount of absolute alcohol-approximately 12–24 g [12]. Accordingly and via the intestinal tube, either 20 g ethanol in 100 ml water (5% v/v) or water (placebo) was perfused at a rate of 7 ml/min for 15 min. Earlier observations have indicated that ethanol can reach concentrations of 2–10% in small intestinal lumen after consumption of 50 ml ethanol in 20% solution [23]. Ethanol was introduced directly into the duodenum to overcome interindividual variations in its upper GI metabolism after oral consumption [24]. Thereafter, participants received an oral multi-sugar drink to assess intestinal permeability, consisting of 1 g lactulose (Centrafarm, Etten-Leur, the Netherlands), 1 g sucralose (Brenntag, Sittard, the Netherlands), 1 g erythritol (Danisco, Copenhagen, Denmark), 1 g sucrose (Van Gilse, Dinteloord, the Netherlands), and 0.5 g L-rhamnose (Danisco) dissolved in 150 ml tap water. At t = 30 min after start of placebo or ethanol perfusion, participants underwent a gastroduodenoscopy to obtain mucosal biopsies from the second part of the duodenum (forceps diameter: 2.8 mm). Tissue samples were frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until further analyses. Blood was collected before and 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 min after onset of ethanol perfusion. Urine was collected in plastic containers before, and in three fractions after ethanol perfusion, i.e. 0–2 h, 2–5 h and 5–24 h. All samples were stored at −80°C within 4 hours after collection. For safety, participants were not allowed to leave the hospital unless their breath ethanol concentration was <0.05%, the legal limit in the Netherlands.
Measurements
Liver function, blood ethanol and fatty acid ethyl esters (FAEEs) levels.
Plasma alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and γ-glutamyltransferas (γGT) were determined before and 60 min after ethanol perfusion. Blood ethanol concentrations were determined by headspace gas chromatography aided with Flame Ionization Detection System with a detection limit of 10 mg/dL. Plasma concentrations were converted to blood alcohol concentration (BAC) using the conversion factor 0.809. Plasma levels of fatty acid ethyl esters (FAEEs) including ethyl oleate and ethyl palmitate were analyzed by gas chromatograph with a mass selective detector GC-MS QP-2010 PLUS equipped with GCMS solutions Software (Shimadzu, Maryland, U.S.A) [25].
Assessment of intestinal barrier function.
Intestinal barrier function was assessed using a multi-sugar recovery test. Urinary sugar recovery was quantified by combined HPLC (Model PU-1980 pump, Jasco Benelux, Maarsen, the Netherlands) and mass spectrometry (Model LTQXL, Thermo Electron, Breda, the Netherlands) as described by van Wijck et al. [26]. Sucrose in 0–2 h urine, Lactulose/rhamnose (L/R) ratio in 0–5 h urine and sucralose/erythritol (S/E) ratios in the 5–24 h urine fraction were determined as indicators for gastroduodenal, small and large intestinal permeability, respectively.
Localization and gene expression of ZO-1 and occludin in duodenal mucosa.
Immunofluorescent staining was performed as described previously [27], with minor modifications [27]. Tissue sections were examined under Leica TCS SPE confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica Micro systems GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), images were acquired at 512×512 pixel resolutions and z-stacks were obtained using Leica Application Suite Advanced Fluorescence software (Leica Microsystems GmbH). Images were processed and quantified as described by Fisher et al. [28], with minor modifications. Briefly, fluorescent staining of ZO-1 and occludin in the TJ region from uniform Z sections perpendicular to the apical cell surface of the epithelium were subjected to projection and passed through a Gaussian smoothing filter. Plot profiles of the staining intensity along the perpendicular lines were generated using Image J software [29]. Next, grey scale values of each image were calculated and normalized against a summed maximum intensity matrix (512×512×256) [28].
Gene expression of occludin, claudin 3, and claudin 4, myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) and ZO-1 in duodenal mucosal biopsies was evaluated by qPCR as described previously [30]. Primer sequences are given in the Table S1.
Assessment of MAPK isoforms phosphorylation in duodenal biopsies.
Frozen tissue samples were homogenized in ice-cold PBS containing protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (10 µl/ml PBS; Sigma-Aldrich). Concentrations of soluble proteins were quantified in tissue supernatants using the bicinchoninic acid assay (BCA; Bio-Rad). Lysates of Hela cells treated with Anisomycin were used as positive controls for phosphorylated P38 and JNK, whereas A431 cells treated with recombinant human epidermal growth factor were used for ERK1/2. Phosphorylated forms of P38, ERK1/2 and JNK in tissue and cell lysates were analysed using semi-quantitative sandwich ELISA according to manufacturer's instructions (Ray Biotech), and data are expressed as optical density (OD) at 450 nm.
Functional and structural assessment of epithelial barrier in Caco-2 cell monolayers.
Colon adenocarcinoma cell line (Caco-2) from ATCC (Rockville, USA; passage 30–40) were maintained in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM; Lonza Benelux BV, Breda, the Netherlands) and barrier permeability was determined using Caco-2 monolayers grown on collagen-coated permeable polycarbonate Transwell filters (Costar, Cambridge, MA, USA) as described previously [16]. Briefly, monolayers were exposed to 40 mM ethanol for 3 h, either alone or after pretreatment for 1 h with 100 µM SB2035809 (P38 inhibitor; Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA), PD98059 (ERK 1/2 inhibitor; Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA) or SP600125 (JNK inhibitor; Selleckchem, TX, USA) in medium. Thereafter, barrier function was assessed by measuring transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) and apical to basolateral permeation of the fluorescent marker fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled dextran 4 KDa (1 mg/ml FITC-D4; Sigma-Aldrich) using an EVOM Epithelial Voltohmmeter (World Precision Instruments, Berlin, Germany) and spectrophotometer at an excitation and emission wavelengths of 498 nm and 540 nm, respectively, and permeability was quantified as percentage of TEER and FITC-D4 permeating to the basal compartment.
Following subjection to the aforementioned treatments, Caco-2 monolayers were fixed on the inserts for 10 min with 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 in PBS at RT for 40 min. Next, monolayers were processed for immunofluorescence staining of the TJ proteins ZO-1 and occludin, AJ proteins E-cadherin and β-catenin, and F-actin as we described previously [16].
Determination of MAPK isoforms and MLC protein phosphorylation in Caco-2 cells.
Phosphorylation of P38, ERK1/2 and JNK, and MLC as indicative of MAPK and MLCK activation was determined using cell-based ELISA kits (Ray Biotech Inc, Norcross, GA, USA.) according to manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, Caco-2 cells (20×103) were seeded in 96 well-plates (Corning BV) and incubated overnight at 37°C, 5% CO2. Monolayers were treated as described earlier. In some experiments, monolayers were also treated with 50 µM of MLCK inhibitor 1-(5-iodonaphthalene-1-sulfonyl)-1H-hexahydro-1, 4-diazepine (ML-7). Next, monolayers were fixed and blocked and were incubated with rabbit anti: total and phosphorylated P38 (p-P38), ERK1/2 (p-ERK1/2) and JNK (p-JNK, 1∶100 dilution in the blocking solution; Ray Biotech), and phosphorylated MLC (p-MLC1∶100 dilution in the blocking solution; Cell Signaling Technology), followed by HRP-conjugated mouse anti-rabbit IgG (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Finally, 3, 3′, 5, 5′-Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) was added, followed by stop solution and optical density was read at 450 nm by SpectraMax M2 spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices).
Power calculation and statistical analyses.
Primary outcome was intestinal permeability. Based on study by Troost et al. [31] comparing small intestinal permeability before and after intake of indomethacin in15 healthy volunteers, lactulose/rhamnose (L/R) ratio increased from 0.013±0.009 to 0.031±0.020 after indomethacin treatment. In the above mentioned study, the standard deviation (SD) in the indomethacin-treated group was 0.02 and the mean difference was 0.018. In our study, each subject matched to one control and to detect comperable differences in small intestinal permeability using SD of 0.02, 12 healthy volunteers were needed to be able to reject the null hypothesis that the population means of the experimental and control groups are equal using the probability power β = 0.8 and the type I error probability α = 0.05. This sample size calculation was performed with PS-Power and Sample Size Program version 3.0. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software (version 5, Windows, San Diego, CA, USA). Data were tested for normality by the Kolmogorov-Smirnoff test. Normally distributed data were analyzed by independent Student's t test. Wilcoxon's and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for abnormally distributed data. In vitro data, each conducted in triplicate, are presented as means ± SD of at least three experiments. Data were analysed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni multiple comparisons and P-values adjustment (Bonferroni correction), and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Subjects
Twelve male healthy volunteers [age 30.8±3.1 years; BMI 23.0±0.07 kg/m2] participated in this study. None of the participants experienced any GI discomfort during the test days. No side effects occurred and no changes in plasma ALT and γGT levels after ethanol administration were observed (data not shown).
Ethanol and FAEE
Blood samples collected prior to the intervention were negative for ethanol (i.e. <10 mg/dl plasma) and FAEEs. Following intraduodenal ethanol, plasma ethanol concentration peaked at 15 min (62 mg/dl) and gradually declined to 11 mg/dl at 180 min (Figure 1A). Mean plasma concentrations of the FAEEs ethyl oleate and ethyl palmitate were significantly increased 30 min after ethanol administration and decreased towards basal levels at 180 min (P = 0.0003 and P<0.0001, respectively; Figure 1B).
[A] Ethanol was analyzed in plasma of the individual volunteers after ethanol administration at the following time points: 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, and 180 min, and presented as mean ± SD. [B] Ethyl oleate and Ethyl palmitate were determined in plasma at 0, 30, and 180 min, and presented as mean ± SD (n = 12).
Gastroduodenal, small and large intestinal permeability
There was no significant difference in mean urinary sucrose recovery between placebo (2.309±0.85) and ethanol (3.087±1.51), (P = 0.1349; Figure 2A). However, the L/R ratio, representing small intestinal permeability, was significantly higher after ethanol (0.089±0.04) compared to placebo (0.047±0.02), (P = 0.0076; Figure 2B). Furthermore, ethanol significantly increased the S/E ratio in 5–24 h urine, as indicator for large intestinal permeability, versus placebo (0.317±0.18 vs. 0.026±0.03, respectively), (P = 0.0007; Figure 2C).
[A] Effects on gastroduodenal permeability (sucrose, 0–5 h urinary recovery). Data presented as boxplots displaying minimum, maximum, and the 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles (n = 12); P>0.05 vs. placebo. [B] Effects on small intestinal permeability (lactulose/rhamnose; L/R ratio, 0–5 h urine). Data presented as boxplots displaying minimum, maximum, and the 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles (n = 12); *P<0.01 vs. placebo. [C] Effects on large intestinal permeability (sucralose/erythritol; S/E ratio, 5–24 h urine). Data presented as boxplots displaying minimum, maximum, and the 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles (n = 11); *P<0.01 vs. placebo. [D] Representative images of immune-localization of ZO-1 (green), occludin (red), and nuclei (blue) at a 400x magnification are shown. Scale bar represents 10 µm. [E] Normalized intensity of immunofluorescent-labelled ZO-1 and occludin in duodenal mucosa. Z-stack images were at 40× objective power. Data are mean ± SD (n = 12). *P<0.05 for ZO-1, #P<0.05 for occludin. [F] Normalized mRNAs expression of occludin (occl), claudin 4 (clau4), and claudin 3 (clau3), MLCK and ZO-1 in duodenal biopsy specimens determined by qPCR. Each bar represents the mean± SD; *P<0.05 comparing ethanol with placebo.
Localization and expression of TJ proteins in duodenal mucosa
After placebo administration, ZO-1 and occludin showed strong staining in duodenal biopsies at the apical part of epithelial cells, being continuous without disruption and showed colocalization along the villous epithelium. In contrast, after ethanol, ZO-1 and occludin showed less immune reactivity, disruption and complete absence of colocalization at the apical membrane compared with placebo (Figure 2D). These features were confirmed by measurement of normalized image intensity of immunolabeled ZO-1 and occludin in duodenal biopsies. The normalized intensity of both ZO-1 and occludin decreased significantly after ethanol versus placebo (P = 0.0008 and P<0.0001, respectively; Figure 2E). In addition, ethanol significantly down-regulated ZO-1 and up-regulated MLCK mRNA expression compared to placebo (P = 0.092 and P = 0.0492, respectively; Figure 2F). No differences were found in gene expression of occludin, claudin 3 and claudin 4 (P>0.05; Figure 2F).
Phosphorylation of MAPK isoforms in duodenal mucosal biopsies
The phosphorylation of MAPK isoforms in duodenal mucosal biopsies after ethanol and placebo administration was checked quantitatively using ELISA. Results showed that ethanol significantly increased the level of phosphorylated P38 (p-P38; P<0.0001), ERK1/2 (p-ERK; P<0.0001) and JNK (p-JNK; P = 0.0001) compared to the placebo (Figure 3A, B and C, respectively).
Mucosal protein was isolated from tissue lysates, and the levels of phosphorylated MAPK isoforms were determined by ELISA using anti-phosphospecific antibodies against p-P38 [A], p-ERK1/2 [B], and [C] and p-JNK. Lysates of Hela cells treated with Anisomycin were used as positive control (+ve control) for phosphorylated P38 and JNK, whereas A431 cells treated with recombinant human epidermal growth factor were used for phosphorylated ERK1/2. (n = 12 separate sample preparations; *P<0.05 vs. placebo).
Phosphorylation of MAPK isoforms in Caco-2 cells
Next, we used Caco-2 cell monolayers to further elucidate the role of MAPK activation in ethanol-induced barrier disruption in vitro by assessment of their protein phosphorylation. Compared with control, 40 mM ethanol significantly induced activation of MAPK in Caco-2 cells, indicated by increased p-P38/total P38 (P = 0.0168; Figure 4A), p-ERK1/2/total ERK1/2 (P = 0.0002; Figure 4B), and p-JNK/total JNK ratio (P = 0.0034; Figure 4C). Activation of MAPK was completely prevented by pretreatment with the P38 kinase inhibitor SB2035809 (P = 0.0187; Figure 4A), ERK1/2 inhibitor PD98059 (P = 0.0003; Figure 4B) and JNK inhibitor SP600125 (P = 0.0022; Figure 4C). To determine whether ethanol exposure causes MAPK activation via oxidative stress, Caco-2 cells were exposed to ethanol with or without L-cysteine, the rate limiting substrate for glutathione synthesis. Pretreatment with L-cysteine (100 µM) significantly attenuated ethanol-induced activation of P38 (P = 0.0075; Figure 4D), ERK1/2 (P<0.0001; Figure 4E), and JNK ((P = 0.0002; Figure 4F).
[A] Phosphorylation of P38, [B] ERK1/2, and [C] JNK was determined by cell-based ELISA and expressed as the ratio of the phosphorylated to the total form of each protein. n = 3 and *P<0.0001 vs. control and #P<0.0001 vs. ethanol in the presence of SB2035809, PD98055, or SP600125, respectively. Effect of L-cysteine on ethanol-induced phosphorylation of P38 [D], ERK1/2 [E], and JNK [F], determined by cell-based ELISA, and expressed as the ratio of the phosphorylated to the total amount of each protein. H2O2 used as positive control. n = 3 and *P<0.0001 vs. control and #P<0.0001 vs. ethanol after pretreatment with L-cysteine.
MAPK activation in ethanol-induced barrier disruption in Caco-2 monolayers
To evaluate the role of MAPK in effects of ethanol on intestinal barrier function, pharmacological inhibitors of its isoforms were used. Caco-2 monolayers exposed to ethanol showed a significant decrease in TEER (P<0.0001, P<0.0001, P<0.0001; Figure 5A, C and E, respectively) and increased FITC-D4 permeation (P<0.0001, P<0.0001, P<0.0001; Figure 5B, D, and F, respectively) compared to controls. In contrast, monolayers pretreated with the MAPK isoforms inhibitors SB2035809, PD98059 and SP600125 showed no drop but significant increase in TEER (P<0.0001; P = 0.0002, P<0.0001; Figure 5A, C and E, respectively) and significant decrease in FITC-D4 permeation (P<0.0001, P<0.0001, P<0.0001; Figure 5B, D, and F, respectively) in response to ethanol treatment. Compared to controls, treatment of Caco-2 monolayers with 40 mM ethanol induced delocalization and internalization of ZO-1 and occludin (Figure 6A), E-cadherin and β-catenin from apical membranes to intracellular compartments (Figure 6B). However, inhibition of MAPK isoforms with SB2035809, PD98059 and SP600125 prevented ethanol-induced changes in localization of the TJ (Figure 6A), and AJ (Figure 6B). Ethanol-induced intestinal barrier dysfunction may involve MLCK activation, as indicated by MLC phosphorylation [17]. As shown in Figure 6C, ethanol significantly increased MLC phosphorylation in Caco-2 monolayers compared to controls (P<0.0001). However, inhibition of MAPK with SB2035809, PD98059 and SP600125 significantly attenuated ethanol-induced induced MLC phosphorylation (P<0.0001; P<0.0001, P<0.000, respectively; Figure 6C), which was comparable to effects of the specific MLCK inhibitor 1-(5-iodonaphthalene-1-sulfonyl)-1H-hexahydro-1, 4-diazepine (ML-7) [17]. Since MLCK activation induces contraction of the peri-junctional actomyosin ring resulting in loss of TJ integrity [32], our experiments were extended further to elucidate effects of MAPK inhibition on ethanol-induced actin cytoskeleton rearrangement by immunofluorescence microscopy. As shown in figure 6D, in control condition, basal F-actin is uniformly distributed and organized in ring-like structures around the cellular periphery. However, in ethanol-treated monolayers, F-actin appears disorganized with thickened stress fibers (Figure 6D, arrowhead). Inhibition of MAPK isoforms by SB2035809, PD98059 and SP600125 attenuated ethanol-induced remodeling of actin cytoskeleton (Figure 6D).
Confluent human intestinal epithelial cells (Caco-2) grown on inserts were assessed for trans-epithelial electrical resistance (TEER) and permeability to FITC-D4 after 3 h after treatment with P38 inhibitor [A] and [B], ERK1/2 inhibitor [C] and [D] and JNK inhibitor [E] and [F], respectively. Permeability is expressed as percentage of basal TEER and FITC-D4 permeation from apical to basal chamber. Some cells were treated only with medium or ethylene glycol tetra acetic acid (EGTA) as negative (-ve CTR) and positive control (+ve CTR), respectively. In addition, some monolayers were pretreated for 1 h with 100 µM of the P38-specific kinase inhibitor SB2035809, ERK1/2 PD98055 and JNK SP600125. Data are means ± SD of triplicate wells from three separate experiments. *P<0.0001 vs. control, #P<0.001, &P<0.0001 and $P<0.05 vs. ethanol after pretreatment with each MAPK inhibitor.
Monolayers subjected to aforementioned treatments were washed, fixed, permeabilized, and double-stained for ZO-1, occludin and E-cadherin, and ß-catenin. [A] Representative images of immunostaining of ZO-1 (green) and occludin (red) of three independent experiments. Scale bar = 10 µm. [B] Representative images of immunostaining of E-cadherin (green) and β-catenin (red). Scale bar = 10 µm. [C] Effects of MAPK inhibition on ethanol (EtOH)-induced myosin light chain (MLC) phosphorylation. Caco-2 cell monolayers were incubated with 40 mM ethanol (EtOH) for 3 h with or without MAPK inhibitors (as in Figure 6) or MLCK inhibitor (ML-7) pretreatment for 1 h, and analyzed by cell-based ELISA, using phosphospecific MLC antibodies (n = 3). Each bar represents the mean ± SD; *P<0.0001 vs. control and #P<0.0001 vs. ethanol. [D] Effects of MAPK inhibition on ethanol (EtOH)-induced F-actin reorganization. Caco-2 cell monolayers incubated with 40 mM ethanol for 3 h with or without MAPK inhibitors pretreatment for 1 h were fixed and stained for F-actin with Texas red-X phalloidin Scale bar = 10 µm.
Discussion
This study demonstrates that administration of a single moderate ethanol dose increases both small and large intestinal permeability in healthy volunteers.The impairment of intestinal barrier function was paralleled by redistribution of ZO-1 and occludin, down-regulation of ZO-1 and up-regulation of MLCK gene expression, and activation of MAPK isoforms (i.e.p38, ERK1/2 and JNK) in duodenal mucosa. In vitro data confirmed that ethanol induces MAPK isoforms phosphorylation, together with changes in permeability, redistribution of ZO-1 and occludin, disruption of F-actin ring and a significant increase in phosphorylation of MLC. These changes were reversed by the anti-oxidant L-cysteine and by MAPK inhibitors. Previous studies reporting on effects of ethanol intestinal barrier function have mainly been performed in alcoholics [20]. We are the first to report on effects of a moderate dose of ethanol on intestinal epithelial barrier combining data at functional level with data of epithelial TJs at transcriptional and posttranscriptional level focusing on potential mechanisms.
At functional level, our results are in line with those of Robinson et al. [33] showing that a single moderate dose of ethanol increases excretion of urinary PEG 400, pointing to increased small intestinal permeability. We did not observe any effect on gastroduodenal permeability in the present study, in contrast to previous reports [5], [34]. This is not surprising given the fact that ethanol was administered via a tube directly into the distal duodenum, bypassing the stomach and proximal duodenum.
Interestingly, we found not only increase in small intestinal permeability but also in colon. While an increase in colon permeability by ethanol has been reported in animal studies, so far no data are available with respect to the human condition. In rats, ethanol (3–4.5 g/kg) gavage for 12 days was found to increase colon permeability. This could be prevented by antibiotics and also by mast cell membrane stabilizers, pointing to involvement of colon microbiota and mast cell activation [35].
After ingestion, ethanol can reach colon mucosa by diffusion from blood [13]. Intestinal bacteria exhibit alcohol dehydrogenase (ALD) and to a lesser extent aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity [36] with a lower capacity to metabolize acetaldehyde [37]. Together with less active ALDH in colon mucosa [38], this will result in intracolonic accumulation of acetaldehyde. Increased intracolonic accumulation of acetaldehyde is considered an important factor contributing to colorectal carcinogenesis [39] and hepatotoxicity [40].
Little is known about the duration of the increments in small and large intestinal permeability by ethanol. Robinson et al. [33] found the increase in small intestinal permeability after a single ethanol dose to be transient. This does not exclude that prolonged changes may occur after repeated, chronic ethanol exposure. Ethanol consumption has been associated with elevation of plasma endotoxins [41] and increased drug absorption [42], possibly through changes in intestinal barrier function. Recent data indicate that moderate red wine consumption (i.e. 20 g ethanol per day) by patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) in remission, in whom intestinal permeability already is increased, even further increases both small and large intestinal permeability [34].
We found that ethanol-induced increase in small intestinal permeability was associated with disruption of the key TJ proteins ZO-1 and occludin, and modulated mRNA expression of ZO-1 and MLCK in duodenal biopsies. Timing of biopsy sampling, i.e. 30 min after ethanol perfusion, was based on plasma ethanol levels. Mechanistic studies in humans on effects of moderate ethanol intake are lacking. However, in chronic alcoholics, Tang et al. [43] have reported increase in microRNA 212 expression in colon mucosa with subsequent post-transcriptional suppression of ZO-1 synthesis.
In vitro, down-regulation of ZO-1 and activation of MLCK has been shown to mediate ethanol-induced TJ disruption and actin cytoskeleton rearrangement, and consequently, increased intestinal epithelial permeability [17]. Other cell signaling pathways including MAPK have also been proposed as mechanism for ethanol-induced barrier dysfunction [44]. MAPK isoforms including p38, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and stress-activated protein kinase/C-Jun N-terminal kinase (SAPK/JNK) represent a converging point for many signaling pathways and have been linked to broad spectrum of cellular responses to extracellular stimuli such as growth factors and stress [45]. In the present study, we observed that ethanol induced phosphorylation of p38, ERK1/2 and JNK in duodenal mucosa, indicating their activation. These observations led us to further explore their role in Caco-2 cell monolayers. Our in vitro results confirmed that ethanol exposure, at a concentration that can be achieved in blood after moderate consumption, can induce MAPK activation akin to H2O2, a potent oxidative stress inducer. In addition, ethanol increased permeability and induced abnormal distribution of TJ proteins and AJ proteins, which could be attenuated by MAPK inhibition. Such effects were not found after pretreatment with the anti-oxidant L-cysteine, indicating that ethanol activates MAPK, at least in part, through an oxidative stress-dependent mechanism. This finding is in line with reports by others and by our group, identifying oxidative stress as a key factor in the mechanisms by which ethanol and its metabolites disrupt intestinal barrier function [46], [47]. Furthermore, oxidative stress has been found to activate MAPK in intestinal epithelial cells [48]. Therefore, our findings have relevance for ethanol-induced gut leakiness and indicate that the deleterious effects on barrier integrity can be reduced with antioxidants.
The inability of ethanol to induce changes in Caco-2 monolayers after pretreatment with MAPK inhibitors suggests that ethanol requires MAPK activation to disrupt TJ, highlighting a pivotal role for MAPK in ethanol-induced barrier disruption. Previously, it has been found that p38-dependent MLCK activation is required for burn-induced intestinal permeability [49]. Our study provided evidences that ethanol leads to MAPK-dependent MLC phosphorylation, F-actin rearrangement and stress fiber formation in Caco-2 cells. Disruption of actin cytoskeleton and interaction with TJ and AJ have been implicated in ethanol and acetaldehyde-induced loss of TJ integrity in Caco-2 cell monolayers [50]. Therefore, our in vitro data support the in vivo observations that ethanol increases intestinal permeability in association with up-regulation of MLCK gene expression and activation of MAPK in duodenal mucosa.
Ethanol and FAEEs including ethyl oleate and ethyl palmitate were measured in plasma, showing that ethanol can reach high levels within 30 min after administration accompanied by increased concentrations of the FAEEs ethyl oleate and ethyl palmitate. Acetaldehyde concentrations have not been measured due to its volatile character.
Duodenal biopsies obtained at the same time point (i.e. 30 min post-administration) have shown major changes on TJ at both posttranscriptional and transcriptional levels. Prior in vitro data have shown that ethanol [46], acetaldehyde [51] and FAEEs [47] can increase paracellular permeability in Caco-2 monolayers. Since intestinal mucosa is considered a major site for FAEE synthesis [52], together with a shift in ethanol metabolism into nonoxidative pathways resulting from low ALD activity in chronic alcoholics additive or even synergistic deleterious effects of ethanol and its oxidative and nonoxidative metabolites are expected to occur in vivo [53].
Limitations of our study include the lack of assessment of TJ integrity at the colon mucosal level. In addition, being a proof of concept study, ethanol was administered directly into the duodenum to overcome interindividual variations in its upper GI metabolism. Our data allow future studies to include more physiological approaches with a major focus on the colon.
In conclusion, a moderate dose of ethanol increases small and large intestinal permeability. Oxidative stress-mediated activation of MAPK is involved in ethanol-induced TJ and AJ disruption, actin cytoskeleton reorganization and consequently, intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction. Our findings have potential implications for pathogenesis of alcoholic-related liver and GI disorders. A better understanding of molecular mechanisms involved in ethanol-induced gut leakiness may provide clues for development of preventive strategies.
Supporting Information
Figure S1.
Flow diagram showing the process of enrolment, allocation, follow up and analysis of the study.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107421.s001
(TIF)
Figure S2.
Timeline of the test day. B, Blood sample; EtOH, Ethanol; G, Gastroduodenoscopy; S, Oral intake of sugars; Pl, Placebo.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107421.s002
(TIF)
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by Top Institute Food and Nutrition, Wageningen, Netherlands. The funding body had no role in designing or conducting the study.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: EE DJ FT JD. Performed the experiments: EE DK HP KA. Analyzed the data: EE. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AM DJ. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: EE DJ AM JD.
References
- 1. Mann RE, Smart RG, Govoni R (2003) The epidemiology of alcoholic liver disease. Alcohol Res Health 27: 209–219.
- 2. Sawada T, Kita J, Nagata H, Shimoda M, Kubota K (2007) Hepatectomy for metastatic liver tumor in patients with liver dysfunction. Hepatogastroenterology 54: 2306–2309.
- 3. Rao RK, Seth A, Sheth P (2004) Recent Advances in Alcoholic Liver Disease I. Role of intestinal permeability and endotoxemia in alcoholic liver disease. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 286: G881–884.
- 4. Szabo G, Bala S (2010) Alcoholic liver disease and the gut-liver axis. World J Gastroenterol 16: 1321–1329.
- 5. Keshavarzian A, Fields JZ, Vaeth J, Holmes EW (1994) The differing effects of acute and chronic alcohol on gastric and intestinal permeability. Am J Gastroenterol 89: 2205–2211.
- 6. Bode JC, Bode C, Heidelbach R, Durr HK, Martini GA (1984) Jejunal microflora in patients with chronic alcohol abuse. Hepatogastroenterology 31: 30–34.
- 7. Tabata T, Tani T, Endo Y, Hanasawa K (2002) Bacterial translocation and peptidoglycan translocation by acute ethanol administration. J Gastroenterol 37: 726–731.
- 8. Mandrekar P, Catalano D, Szabo G (1999) Inhibition of lipopolysaccharide-mediated NFkappaB activation by ethanol in human monocytes. Int Immunol 11: 1781–1790.
- 9. Squier CA, Cox P, Hall BK (1986) Enhanced penetration of nitrosonornicotine across oral mucosa in the presence of ethanol. J Oral Pathol 15: 276–279.
- 10. Eckardt MJ, File SE, Gessa GL, Grant KA, Guerri C, et al. (1998) Effects of moderate alcohol consumption on the central nervous system. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 22: 998–1040.
- 11. Bode C, Kugler V, Bode JC (1987) Endotoxemia in patients with alcoholic and non-alcoholic cirrhosis and in subjects with no evidence of chronic liver disease following acute alcohol excess. J Hepatol 4: 8–14.
- 12. Dufour MC (1999) What is moderate drinking? Defining “drinks” and drinking levels. Alcohol Res Health 23: 5–14.
- 13.
Elamin EE, Masclee AA, Dekker J, Jonkers DM (2013) Ethanol metabolism and its effects on the intestinal epithelial barrier. Nutrition Reviews 2.
- 14. Shen L, Weber CR, Raleigh DR, Yu D, Turner JR (2011) Tight junction pore and leak pathways: a dynamic duo. Annual review of physiology 73: 283–309.
- 15. Guo X, Rao JN, Liu L, Zou TT, Turner DJ, et al. (2003) Regulation of adherens junctions and epithelial paracellular permeability: a novel function for polyamines. American journal of physiology Cell physiology 285: C1174–1187.
- 16. Elamin E, Jonkers D, Juuti-Uusitalo K, van Ijzendoorn S, Troost F, et al. (2012) Effects of ethanol and acetaldehyde on tight junction integrity: in vitro study in a three dimensional intestinal epithelial cell culture model. PLoS One 7: e35008.
- 17. Ma TY, Nguyen D, Bui V, Nguyen H, Hoa N (1999) Ethanol modulation of intestinal epithelial tight junction barrier. Am J Physiol 276: G965–974.
- 18. Usatyuk PV, Natarajan V (2004) Role of mitogen-activated protein kinases in 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal-induced actin remodeling and barrier function in endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 279: 11789–11797.
- 19. Samak G, Narayanan D, Jaggar JH, Rao R (2011) CaV1.3 channels and intracellular calcium mediate osmotic stress-induced N-terminal c-Jun kinase activation and disruption of tight junctions in Caco-2 CELL MONOLAYERS. J Biol Chem 286: 30232–30243.
- 20. Elamin EE, Masclee AA, Dekker J, Jonkers DM (2013) Ethanol metabolism and its effects on the intestinal epithelial barrier. Nutr Rev 71: 483–499.
- 21. Seitz HK, Egerer G, Simanowski UA, Waldherr R, Eckey R, et al. (1993) Human gastric alcohol dehydrogenase activity: effect of age, sex, and alcoholism. Gut 34: 1433–1437.
- 22.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2010) In: Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 7th Edition ed: Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2010: 30–32. p.
- 23. Millan MS, Morris GP, Beck IT, Henson JT (1980) Villous damage induced by suction biopsy and by acute ethanol intake in normal human small intestine. Dig Dis Sci 25: 513–525.
- 24. Stermer E (2002) Alcohol consumption and the gastrointestinal tract. Isr Med Assoc J 4: 200–202.
- 25. Hutson JR, Rao C, Fulga N, Aleksa K, Koren G (2011) An improved method for rapidly quantifying fatty acid ethyl esters in meconium suitable for prenatal alcohol screening. Alcohol 45: 193–199.
- 26. Bhoopathi P, Gondi CS, Gujrati M, Dinh DH, Lakka SS (2011) SPARC mediates Src-induced disruption of actin cytoskeleton via inactivation of small GTPases Rho-Rac-Cdc42. Cell Signal 23: 1978–1987.
- 27. Karczewski J, Troost FJ, Konings I, Dekker J, Kleerebezem M, et al. (2010) Regulation of human epithelial tight junction proteins by Lactobacillus plantarum in vivo and protective effects on the epithelial barrier. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 298: G851–859.
- 28. Fisher OZ, Peppas NA (2008) Quantifying Tight Junction Disruption Caused by Biomimetic pH-Sensitive Hydrogel Drug Carriers. Journal of drug delivery science and technology 18: 47–50.
- 29. Abramoff MD, Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ (2004) Image Processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International 11: 36–42.
- 30. Keszthelyi D, Troost FJ, Jonkers DM, van Donkelaar EL, Dekker J, et al. (2012) Does acute tryptophan depletion affect peripheral serotonin metabolism in the intestine? Am J Clin Nutr 95: 603–608.
- 31. Troost FJ, Saris WH, Brummer RJ (2003) Recombinant human lactoferrin ingestion attenuates indomethacin-induced enteropathy in vivo in healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin Nutr 57: 1579–1585.
- 32. Cunningham KE, Turner JR (2012) Myosin light chain kinase: pulling the strings of epithelial tight junction function. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1258: 34–42.
- 33. Robinson GM, Orrego H, Israel Y, Devenyi P, Kapur BM (1981) Low-molecular-weight polyethylene glycol as a probe of gastrointestinal permeability after alcohol ingestion. Dig Dis Sci 26: 971–977.
- 34. Swanson GR, Tieu V, Shaikh M, Forsyth C, Keshavarzian A (2011) Is moderate red wine consumption safe in inactive inflammatory bowel disease? Digestion 84: 238–244.
- 35. Ferrier L, Berard F, Debrauwer L, Chabo C, Langella P, et al. (2006) Impairment of the intestinal barrier by ethanol involves enteric microflora and mast cell activation in rodents. Am J Pathol 168: 1148–1154.
- 36. Nosova T, Jokelainen K, Kaihovaara P, Jousimies-Somer H, Siitonen A, et al. (1996) Aldehyde dehydrogenase activity and acetate production by aerobic bacteria representing the normal flora of human large intestine. Alcohol Alcohol 31: 555–564.
- 37. Nosova T, Jokelainen K, Kaihovaara P, Heine R, Jousimies-Somer H, et al. (1998) Characteristics of aldehyde dehydrogenases of certain aerobic bacteria representing human colonic flora. Alcohol Alcohol 33: 273–280.
- 38. Koivisto T, Salaspuro M (1996) Aldehyde dehydrogenases of the rat colon: comparison with other tissues of the alimentary tract and the liver. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 20: 551–555.
- 39.
Seitz HK, Homann N (2007) The role of acetaldehyde in alcohol-associated cancer of the gastrointestinal tract. Novartis Found Symp 285: 110–119; discussion 119–114, 198–119.
- 40. Salaspuro M (1996) Bacteriocolonic pathway for ethanol oxidation: characteristics and implications. Ann Med 28: 195–200.
- 41. Shibayama Y, Asaka S, Nakata K (1991) Endotoxin hepatotoxicity augmented by ethanol. Exp Mol Pathol 55: 196–202.
- 42. Weathermon R, Crabb DW (1999) Alcohol and medication interactions. Alcohol Res Health 23: 40–54.
- 43. Tang Y, Banan A, Forsyth CB, Fields JZ, Lau CK, et al. (2008) Effect of alcohol on miR-212 expression in intestinal epithelial cells and its potential role in alcoholic liver disease. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 32: 355–364.
- 44. Leve F, de Souza W, Morgado-Diaz JA (2008) A cross-link between protein kinase A and Rho-family GTPases signaling mediates cell-cell adhesion and actin cytoskeleton organization in epithelial cancer cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 327: 777–788.
- 45. Waskiewicz AJ, Cooper JA (1995) Mitogen and stress response pathways: MAP kinase cascades and phosphatase regulation in mammals and yeast. Curr Opin Cell Biol 7: 798–805.
- 46.
Forsyth CB, Tang Y, Shaikh M, Zhang L, Keshavarzian A (2011) Role of Snail Activation in Alcohol-Induced iNOS-Mediated Disruption of Intestinal Epithelial Cell Permeability. Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
- 47. Elamin E, Masclee A, Juuti-Uusitalo K, van Ijzendoorn S, Troost F, et al. (2013) Fatty Acid Ethyl Esters Induce Intestinal Epithelial Barrier Dysfunction via a Reactive Oxygen Species-Dependent Mechanism in a Three-Dimensional Cell Culture Model. PLoS One 8: e58561.
- 48. Zhou Y, Wang Q, Evers BM, Chung DH (2005) Signal transduction pathways involved in oxidative stress-induced intestinal epithelial cell apoptosis. Pediatr Res 58: 1192–1197.
- 49. Aepfelbacher M, Zumbihl R, Heesemann J (2005) Modulation of Rho GTPases and the actin cytoskeleton by YopT of Yersinia. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 291: 167–175.
- 50. Sheth P, Seth A, Thangavel M, Basuroy S, Rao RK (2004) Epidermal growth factor prevents acetaldehyde-induced paracellular permeability in Caco-2 cell monolayer. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 28: 797–804.
- 51. Rao RK (2008) Acetaldehyde-induced barrier disruption and paracellular permeability in Caco-2 cell monolayer. Methods Mol Biol 447: 171–183.
- 52. Diczfalusy MA, Bjorkhem I, Einarsson C, Hillebrant CG, Alexson SE (2001) Characterization of enzymes involved in formation of ethyl esters of long-chain fatty acids in humans. J Lipid Res 42: 1025–1032.
- 53. Wu H, Cai P, Clemens DL, Jerrells TR, Ansari GA, et al. (2006) Metabolic basis of ethanol-induced cytotoxicity in recombinant HepG2 cells: role of nonoxidative metabolism. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 216: 238–247.